Most of you know I am rational and analytical to a fault. One of many mantras that floated through my childhood was “Trust but verify.” [This, of course, coexisted with forced church attendance, so I guess I should have taken it with a truckload of salt.] My Italian temper flares when my German lust for rules and discipline is thwarted. I have always scoffed at ghost stories, fortune tellers, tarot readings, horoscopes, and most other paranormal, supernatural, or new-agey beliefs. But for the past few days I’ve been proofing a book about ESP, written by a neuropsychologist at Harvard Medical School, and I’m starting to question some of my convictions about the validity of phenomena such as mental telepathy, clairvoyance, telekinesis, and the like. I never knew that so many laboratory studies, most of which have produced statistically significant results, have been conducted (many of which, also, were commissioned by the CIA and have only recently been partially declassified–guess I need to revisit my conspiracy theory beliefs, too). What makes the scientists–and my proof-lovin’ mind–crazy, though, is that while they can reliably reproduce all sorts of unexplainable phenomena, they still can’t, well, explain any of it, any more than they can quantify what constitutes consciousness. So I’m wondering: How many of you believe in ESP, mental telepathy, portents, and the like? Why? Have you had such experiences? What would you attribute them to? Yuliya, I’m especially hoping you weigh in on this, seeing as you’re my resident Brain Expert.
July 25, 2008
A Question for My Readers…
Posted by redsquirrel under Reading | Tags: science, superstitions |[5] Comments
July 26, 2008 at 9:47 am
I’m open to it. It’s not a matter of faith or belief, it’s just not needing to question or prove every aspect of experience.
Thing is, science has been great, but it isn’t a finished job and cannot explain everything yet. So, why shouldn’t there still be things science hasn’t worked out yet. I don’t knnow if the answers will end up being physiological or psychological or something else, but it’s all part of life’s rich and often inexplicable tapestry.
July 26, 2008 at 12:42 pm
But why not try to explain as much as possible? I believe these things are happening, but I want to know why. I’m a little more than halfway through the book now, and it seems to come down to figuring out what consciousness really is, as it seems to exist independent of brain activity (based on studies of people brought to EEG flatline during brain surgery).
July 26, 2008 at 2:26 pm
Sure, there’s stuff that’s inexplicable by science, but that doesn’t mean unscientific gooey explanations work. Science is just still working on it. I tend to be with James Randi on this kind thing, i.e., extremely skeptical.
July 26, 2008 at 9:34 pm
I’ve just always believed in these sorts of things. I grew up watching ‘Unsolved Mysteries’ and reading ghost stories and science fiction. Maybe there is just something the human mind & psyche likes about believing in things which can not be proved? Not offend anyone with the comparison, but we believe in God, Heaven & Hell and science can’t prove that.
July 26, 2008 at 11:08 pm
But these phenomena *have* been proved. It’s the mechanism that still hasn’t been figured out, so I guess what I’m polling is whether people still think it’s hooey even though it’s been proven possible, and what they think is at the root of it. (Also, I don’t believe in God, heaven, or hell.)